The Hepatitis B Foundation is thrilled to announce the addition of a new clinical trials search tool to our website! People around the world can now easily search for clinical trial opportunities on the Hepatitis B Foundation website. Created by Antidote – a company that designs technologies to link patients with scientific opportunities – the new tool filters through all of the trials listed in the U.S. National Library of Medicine’s database of private and publicly funded studies. Searching for clinical trials can be time-consuming and confusing to navigate, but this resource eases the process by finding the best trials for you based upon a series of questions.
You can now search for hepatitis B, hepatitisD and liver cancerclinical trials with a few simple clicks! Clinical trials are a series of research phases that a new drug must go through in order to be approved for widespread use. They are an essential to proving that a treatment is safe and effective for the larger population. Generally, these trials take 10-15 years to go from the laboratory to the public, but delays in finding or retaining enough volunteers can extend the process.
Diverse participationinclinical trials is needed to make sure that a treatment is effective for all groups. Research diversity matters greatly for several reasons. Studies have shown that different races and ethnicities may respond differently to a certain medication. In addition, researchers need to examine the impact of the medication on the populations that will eventually use them. According to data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), individuals from Africa and Asia or of African and Asian descent consistently remain underrepresented in clinical trials; these populations are also disproportionately impacted by hepatitis B. If these groups are underrepresented in trials for hepatitis B treatments, new drugs may not be as effective in these communities, or there may be side effects that researchers were not aware of.
How Our Clinical Trials Finder Works
Using our Clinical Trial Finder takes just a few minutes. After clicking the ‘search’ button, the user will answer a series of questions of general demographic and health questions to determine what trials are near you and you fit the criteria for. You will be able to view the available trials at any point while answering questions, but answering all of the questions will give you the best results. You will also have the option to leave your email to receive personalized trial alerts for new trials that you are eligible for in your area! The new tool is designed to match those who wish to join a clinical trial to the best option for them; it is not designed to benefit any company.
Benefits of Participating in Clinical Trials
While participating in clinical trials helps drug developers, it can also provide major benefits to the participant as well! Blood work, treatments, and monitoring – which can be expensive – are often provided for free to those who are eligible for the duration of their participation in the study. Volunteers can also potentially benefit from the latest medical advancements and developments!
Help Improve the Future of Clinical Trials
You can also help improve the future of drug development and clinical trials by taking our patientengagement survey! The survey, which takes approximately 20-25 minutes to complete, will be made available for use by the US FDA and drug development researchers to help clinical trial development for future hepatitis B therapies. All survey responses are anonymous.
Welcome to the Hepatitis B Research Review! This monthly blog shares recent scientific findings with members of Baruch S. Blumberg Institute (BSBI) labs and the hepatitis B (HBV) community. Technical articles concerning HBV, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and STING protein will be highlighted as well as scientific breakthroughs in cancer, immunology, and virology. For each article, a brief synopsis reporting key points is provided as the BSBI does not enjoy the luxury of a library subscription. The hope is to disseminate relevant articles across our labs and the hep B community.
Summary: This month, researchers in Beijing, China have reported that a therapeutic vaccine composed of polylactic acid microparticles loaded with HBV surface antigen and the mouse STING agonist DMXAA showed efficacy in clearing HBV infection in a mouse model. Researchers from Wuhan, China have reported that SOX2, a transcription factor important for cell proliferation is also a host restriction factor for HBV infection. Also, researchers from the University of Boulder in conjunction with Dr. James Chen’s lab in Dallas have reported the synthesis of two potent cGAS inhibitors.
The incorporation of cationic property and immunopotentiator in poly (lactic acid) microparticles promoted the immune response against chronic hepatitis B – Journal of Controlled Release
This paper from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, introduces a microparticle vaccine which may be used to treat chronic HBV infection (CHB). The 1μm diameter microparticle is made from polylactic acid (PLA), which is a biodegradable polymer typically synthesized from plant starch. The microparticle also contains didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB) which is a double-chain cationic surfactant. This group has previously shown that DDAB may be used as a carrier for the HBV surface protein (HBsAg). DDAB also gives the microparticle a positive charge, which accelerates its phagocytosis into antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and facilitates its escape from lysosomal degradation once in the cell. Additionally, the group loaded microparticles with the mouse STING agonist 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA). The microparticles were refereed to as DDAB-PLA (DP) and DDAB-PLA-DMXAA (DP-D) respectively. Both types of microparticle were saturated with HBV surface antigen (HBsAg). The microparticles were first tested on mouse bone marrow dendritic cells (BMDCs). Administration of microparticles caused less than a 20% reduction of cell viability in these cultures. BMDCs treated with DP-D microparticles had at least ten-fold more expression of IRF-7 and IFN-β mRNA as measured by RT-qPCR than those treated with HBsAg or DP microparticles alone. Surprisingly, the DP-D microparticle-treated cells also had about twice the expression of these genes compared to the positive control HBsAg + DMXAA, which contained ten times more DMXAA than the microparticles. This indicates that the DP-D microparticles induced the STING pathway with high efficiency due to their bioavailability. Next, the group found that DP-D microparticles induced the highest level of chemokine expression (measured via RT-qPCR) and immune cell recruitment (measured via flow cytometry) at the site of injection in inoculated mice compared with HBsAg alone, HBsAg with aluminum salts (traditional vaccine adjuvant), and DP microparticles. This result shows that the DP-D microparticles induced both an innate immune response and an adaptive immune response in mice. Further, the group showed that BMDCs treated with DP-D microparticles had a high level of maturation, expressing CD40, CD86, and MHCII molecules on their surface as measured by flow cytometry. Finally, the group administered the HBsAg-primed microparticles to mice infected with recombinant HBV (rAAV-1.3HBV virus, serotype ayw). Mice treated with both types of microparticles showed a higher cytokine response as well as a higher titer of anti-HBsAg antibody as measured by ELISA. Mice treated with the DP-D microparticles had the most profound immune cell activation and fastest clearance of serum HBsAg. The microparticle vaccine introduced in this publication is promising because it is highly efficient in delivering antigen to immune cells. The microparticles are unique in that they contain a small molecule STING agonist inside. This design is clever because this vaccine stimulates the innate immune system by activating STING and the adaptive immune system by displaying HBsAg to APCs. This promotes HBV clearance in a multifaceted approach: immune cells produce cytokines through the STING pathway, T cells recognize and destroy infected cells, and B cells secrete anti-HBsAg antibodies to neutralize newly formed viruses. This publication highlights the versatility of biodegradable microparticle technology in designing unique approaches to combat infection. Micro- and nanoparticle delivery systems represent a promising avenue for future drugs to combat HBV and other viruses.
SOX2 Represses Hepatitis B Virus Replication by Binding to the Viral EnhII/Cp and Inhibiting the Promoter Activation – Viruses
This paper from Wuhan University in China identifies the protein sex determining region Y box 2 (SOX2) as a host factor that restricts HBV replication. SOX2 is a transcription factor critical for cell proliferation and the tumorigenecity of solid tumors. In 2006, expression of SOX2 along with three other transcription factors was shown to convert somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Overexpression of SOX2 indicates poor prognosis in patients undergoing resection of HCC. In HCC cells, SOX2 has also been found to induce the expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), leading to the tumor’s evasion of the host immune system. Previously, it has been demonstrated that HBV infection induces increased expression of SOX2 in hepatocytes. This study demonstrates that SOX2 inhibits HBV replication by binding to the Enhancer II (EnhII) and Core Promoter (Cp) regions of the HBV genome. By binding to the EnhII/Cp region, SOX2 disrupts the transcription of the mRNA species precore, core, polymerase, and pgRNA. This reduction of mRNA transcription results in reduced levels of core-associated DNA, HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), and HBV e antigen (HBeAg). To learn this, the group co-transfected both HepG2 and Huh7 cells with a fixed concentration of HBV 1.3-mer plasmid DNA alongside variable concentrations of Flag-tagged SOX2 in pcDNA3.1 plasmid DNA. Cells transfected with higher concentrations of SOX2 plasmid DNA showed reduced levels of HBV mRNAs (3.5, 2.4, and 2.1 kb) via Northern blotting. SOX2-transfected cells also showed reduced levels of HBV core-associated DNA via qPCR as well as reduced levels of both HBsAg and HBeAg via ELISA. Next, in order to learn if SOX2 interacts directly with an HBV promoter, a dual-luciferase reporter assay was implemented. Here, four vectors were used, each containing one of the HBV enhancer and/or promoter sequences (preS1, preS2, EnhⅡ/Cp, and EnhⅠ/Xp) upstream of a firefly luciferase reporter. Each of these firefly luciferase reporter vectors were co-transfected into HepG2 cells alongside variable concentrations of SOX2 plasmid DNA. A plasmid encoding Renilla luciferase was also included at a constant concentration in each transfection as a control for transfection efficiency. While firefly luciferase has an emission of 625 nm (red), Renilla luciferase has an emission of 525 nm (green). Therefore, levels of red fluorescence were used to measure the activity of the HBV enhancer/promoter sequences and levels of green fluorescence were utilized as a control for transfection efficiency. Co-transfection with SOX2 significantly diminished the luciferase activity of the EnhII/Cp reporter only and in a dose-responsive manner, indicating its interaction with that region of the HBV genome. Further, using HBV-producing HepAD38 cells, chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) was used to isolate SOX2 protein and then determine what DNA sequence it was bound to. The EnhII/Cp sequence was found to be highly enriched on SOX2 protein. In order to determine which part of the SOX2 protein is required for binding to the EnhII/Cp region, truncated forms of SOX2 were generated in the pcDNA3.1 plasmid. Using the assays described above, it was found that only SOX2 mutants lacking the high mobility group (HMG) domain were unable to bind to the EnhII/Cp region and suppress HBV products. Interestingly, it was found that SOX2 mutants lacking the transcription activation (TA) domain were still able to bind to the EnhII/Cp region. Further, it was demonstrated by Western blot of subcellular fractions and immunofluorescence that SOX2 mutants lacking the HMG domain were unable to enter the nucleus. Finally, studies were performed in an in vivo BALB/c mouse model. Mice were given a hydrodynamic injection of an adeno-associated viral vector conferring HBV (pAAV-HBV1.3) alongside pcDNA3.1 plasmid DNA conferring SOX, SOX2 lacking HMG domain ( SOXΔHMG), or empty vector. Levels of HBsAG and HBeAg in the blood at days two and four were reduced only in mice given the full length SOX2 plasmid. Additionally, mice given the full length SOX2 plasmid had a reduction of 3.5kb HBV mRNA in liver tissues as measured by qPCR and a lower abundance of HBV core antigen (HBcAg) in liver tissues as measured by immunohistochemical staining. This study shows that SOX2 protein, previously shown to be upregulated by HBV, plays an anti-HBV role in the liver. SOX2 is therefore a new host restriction factor of HBV replication. SOX2 may be one protein which contributes to HBV-induced hepatocarcinogenesis, given its role in promoting the transcription of genes involved in cell proliferation. In the future, SOX2 may be utilized for its anti-HBV activity or targeted for the treatment of HCC.
Discovery of Small Molecule Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Inhibitors – The Journal of Organic Chemistry
This paper from the University of Colorado Boulder introduces the development of novel small molecule inhibitors of the protein cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS). This publication is in conjunction with Dr. James Chen’s laboratory at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. Dr. Chen’s lab discovered cGAS in 2012. cGAS is a cytosolic, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)-sensing protein. It belongs to the nucleotidyltransferase family of enzymes which transfer nucleoside monophosphates, the substituents of nucleic acids. When cGAS recognizes dsDNA, it synthesizes the cyclic dinucleotide cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP). cGAMP acts as a second messenger and activates the stimulator of interferon genes protein (STING). Once activated, STING triggers TBK1- and IKK-mediated activation of the transcription factors interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB). In the nucleus, IRF3 and NF-kB induce the expression of type I interferons and other inflammatory cytokines. cGAS is essential for detecting foreign pathogens which contain dsDNA and triggering an innate immune response to clear them. However, excessive or dysfunctional cGAS activity may lead to chronic inflammation and/or autoimmunity. Pharmacologic inhibition of cGAS may provide treatments for diseases including Aicardi-Goutiés syndrome (AGS), lupus erythematosus, and cancer. Current small molecule inhibitors of cGAS are limited by poor specificity and/or cellular activity. In this study, a high throughput virtual screen (HTVS) was utilized to screen about 1.75 million drug-like compounds for activity against the dimer-forming and DNA-binding faces of mouse cGAS (mcGAS). mcGAS was utilized for the in silico screen because the human cGAS (hcGAS)-DNA complex was only recently published. From this virtual screen, ten compounds were further investigated, leading to the selection of one lead compound. This lead was further optimized for greater potency through chemical modifications resulting in the analogues CU-32 and CU-76. The IC50 of both compounds is below 1µM. To test these compounds’ selectivity for cGAS, human monocyte cells THP-1 were either transfected with interferon-stimulatory DNA (ISD) or infected with Sendai virus (SeV). ISD is a 45-basepair DNA known to activate cGAS, while SeV is a single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) virus known to activate the RIG-I-MAVS pathway; both stimuli are known to result in IRF3 activation and dimerization. Following treatment with both compounds, Western blot of the cells was conducted probing for the formation of IRF3 dimers. In ISD-treated cells, CU-32 and CU-76 inhibited the formation of IRF3 dimers in a dose responsive manner. Neither compound had any effect on IRF3 dimer formation in SeV-infected cells. This result indicates that these inhibitors are selective to cGAS. Using in silico molecular docking studies, the group speculates that these compounds disrupt the interface of the cGAS dimer, allosterically inhibiting dimerization. The discovery of novel cGAS inhibitors is exciting and important for multiple reasons. These compounds, if made commercially available will allow for improved experimentation investigating the cGAS/STING pathway. If these compounds or their derivatives are found to be safe and effective in humans, they may be promising candidates for the treatment of autoimmune disorders or cancer.
Meet our guest blogger, David Schad, B.Sc., Junior Research Fellow at the Baruch S. Blumberg Institute studying programmed cell death such as
apoptosis and necroptosis in the context of hepatitis B infection under the direction of PI Dr. Roshan Thapa. David also mentors high school students from local area schools as part of an after-school program in the new teaching lab at the PA Biotech Center. His passion is learning, teaching and collaborating with others to conduct research to better understand nature.
The Hepatitis B Primary Care Workgroup has released a new resource that helps primary care providers prevent, diagnose, and manage hepatitis B! Hepatitis B experts from diverse health disciplines have contributed to making this comprehensive guide, which is available to download for free on the University of Washington’s website.
Hepatitis B is a complex condition that typically is managed by a liver specialist (hepatologist). However, many people in the U.S. and other parts of the world do not have access to a hepatologist. Many primary care doctors do not feel comfortable or know how to properly care for someone living with hepatitis B. This leaves a large gap in managing and treating the infection. Hepatitis B Management: Guidance for the Primary Care Provider helps to close this gap by giving all providers the tools to understand the virus and how to manage it.
Dr. Amy Tang, Director of Immigrant Health at NorthEast Medical Services and one of the hepatitis B experts involved in creating the guide, answered a few questions about why this resource is so important:
Why was a guide on hepatitis B management needed? What gaps will this help fill?
Primary care providers are recommended to screen and vaccinate for hepatitis B in at-risk individuals. However, when an individual tests positive for hepatitis B, they are typically referred to a specialist for care. Because the majority of persons with chronic hepatitis B in the United States are foreign-born with limited English proficiency and often face both linguistic and access barriers to specialists, referral and retention in specialty care for chronic hepatitis B can often lead to lost follow-up. Chronic hepatitis B management involves visits at least every 6 months for lab monitoring as well as routine ultrasounds for liver cancer surveillance for patients who fulfill high-risk criteria for liver cancer including Asian and African men over 40 years of age and Asian women over 50 years of age. Because primary care is already performing routine blood tests and cancer screening for a variety of other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and breast, cervical, and colon cancers respectively, we believe that empowering primary care providers with a simple to use hepatitis B algorithm would promote increased access and retention in care for persons with chronic hepatitis B.
How does this tool work towards the elimination of hepatitis B?
The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report for viral hepatitis elimination by 2030 recommends that primary care providers work closely with hepatitis B specialists and their organizations, e.g., the American Association for the StudyofLiver Diseases (AASLD) and theInfectious Disease Societyof America (IDSA), to increase primary care capacity for HBV screening, vaccination, monitoring, and treatment. Thus the National Taskforce on Hepatitis B in collaboration with ECHO Institute and San Francisco Hep B Free—Bay Area hosted a meeting at the 2018 AASLD Annual Liver Meeting in San Francisco to convene a workgroup of hepatitis B specialists in hepatology, infectious disease, public health, primary care, and pharmacy, as well as representatives from American Collegeof Physicians (ACP) and American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) to discuss how we can increase primary care capacity for not only hepatitis B screening and vaccination, but also management and treatment.
Currently, the majority of hepatitis B care is managed by specialists. AASLD puts forth guidelines and guidance for hepatitis B every couple of years, however, the guidelines can be lengthy, difficult to access, or intimidating for busy primary care providers to utilize. We polled over 100 primary care providers across the country through the National Association of Community Health Centers’ network of providers and found that primary care providers were interested in managing hepatitis B but felt like they did not have the tools and resources at their fingertips to do it manage it confidently. They reported using web-based references like Up-to-Date for easily accessible guidance on conditions they were less familiar with. Thus, we wanted to create an easy to use document that would be easily accessible and free online. We teamed up with University of Washington’s HepatitisB Online to host our Hepatitis B Guidance for Primary Care Providers as a means to widely disseminate our recommendations and work towards the elimination of hepatitis B in the United States and globally.
How and when should primary care providers use this?
Primary care providers should use this hepatitis B guidance document when they decide to screen a patient for hepatitis B as the document guides them through how to properly screen for hepatitis B in asymptomatic individuals, how to interpret their lab results and provide appropriate counseling, and for patients who screen positive for hepatitis B, how to perform their initial evaluation, monitoring, treatment, and liver cancer surveillance. We also have a dedicated section on perinatal management of women screened for hepatitis B that clearly illustrates the simple steps that can be taken by the primary care provider to prevent transmission of hepatitis B from mother to child.
The guide includes detailed information on the following topics:
Chronic Hepatitis B Testing and Management Algorithm
Interpretation of hepatitis B test results
Tests to run on a hepatitis B surface antigen positive (HBsAg +) individual and how to counsel them
Monitoring and management of the HBsAg + individual
Managing pregnant women who are HBsAg +
Monitoring for liver cancer
The guide is part of Hepatitis B Online – a free suite of materials for providers that supplies information on all topics related to hepatitis B such as when a person should begin treatment and liver cancer screenings. The website also includes prescribing information for approved hepatitis B treatments, and clinical calculators to aid in interpreting predictors of liver damage such as the AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) and fibrosis score.
The Hepatitis B Primary Care Workgroup has released a new resource that helps primary care providers prevent, diagnose, and manage hepatitis B! Hepatitis B experts from diverse health disciplines have contributed to making this comprehensive guide, which is available to download for free on the University of Washington’s website.
Hepatitis B is a complex condition that typically is managed by a liver specialist (hepatologist). However, many people in the U.S. and other parts of the world do not have access to a hepatologist. Many primary care doctors do not feel comfortable or know how to properly care for someone living with hepatitis B. This leaves a large gap in managing and treating the infection. Hepatitis B Management: Guidance for the Primary Care Provider helps to close this gap by giving all providers the tools to understand the virus and how to manage it.
Dr. Amy Tang, Director of Immigrant Health at NorthEast Medical Services and one of the hepatitis B experts involved in creating the guide, answered a few questions about why this resource is so important:
Why was a guide on hepatitis B management needed? What gaps will this help fill?
Primary care providers are recommended to screen and vaccinate for hepatitis B in at-risk individuals. However, when an individual tests positive for hepatitis B, they are typically referred to a specialist for care. Because the majority of persons with chronic hepatitis B in the United States are foreign-born with limited English proficiency and often face both linguistic and access barriers to specialists, referral and retention in specialty care for chronic hepatitis B can often lead to lost follow-up. Chronic hepatitis B management involves visits at least every 6 months for lab monitoring as well as routine ultrasounds for liver cancer surveillance for patients who fulfill high-risk criteria for liver cancer including Asian and African men over 40 years of age and Asian women over 50 years of age. Because primary care is already performing routine blood tests and cancer screening for a variety of other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and breast, cervical, and colon cancers respectively, we believe that empowering primary care providers with a simple to use hepatitis B algorithm would promote increased access and retention in care for persons with chronic hepatitis B.
How does this tool work towards the elimination of hepatitis B?
The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report for viral hepatitis elimination by 2030 recommends that primary care providers work closely with hepatitis B specialists and their organizations, e.g., the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and theInfectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), to increase primary care capacity for HBV screening, vaccination, monitoring, and treatment. Thus the National Taskforce on Hepatitis B in collaboration with ECHOInstitute and San Francisco Hep B Free—Bay Area hosted a meeting at the 2018 AASLD Annual Liver Meeting in San Francisco to convene a workgroup of hepatitis B specialists in hepatology, infectious disease, public health, primary care, and pharmacy, as well as representatives from American College of Physicians (ACP) and American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) to discuss how we can increase primary care capacity for not only hepatitis B screening and vaccination, but also management and treatment.
Currently, the majority of hepatitis B care is managed by specialists. AASLD puts forth guidelines and guidance for hepatitis B every couple of years, however the guidelines can be lengthy, difficult to access, or intimidating for busy primary care providers to utilize. We polled over 100 primary care providers across the country through the National Association of Community Health Centers’ network of providers and found that primary care providers were interested in managing hepatitis B but felt like they did not have the tools and resources at their fingertips to do it manage it confidently. They reported using web-based references like Up-to-Date for easily accessible guidance on conditions they were less familiar with. Thus, we wanted to create an easy to use document that would be easily accessible and free online. We teamed up with University of Washington’s Hepatitis B Online to host our Hepatitis B Guidance for Primary Care Providers as a means to widely disseminate our recommendations and work towards the elimination of hepatitis B in the United States and globally.
How and when should primary care providers use this?
Primary care providers should use this hepatitis B guidance document when they decide to screen a patient for hepatitis B as the document guides them through how to properly screen for hepatitis B in asymptomatic individuals, how to interpret their lab results and provide appropriate counseling, and for patients who screen positive for hepatitis B, how to perform their initial evaluation, monitoring, treatment, and liver cancer surveillance. We also have a dedicated section on perinatal management of women screened for hepatitis B that clearly illustrates the simple steps that can be taken by the primary care provider to prevent transmission of hepatitis B from mother to child.
The guide includes detailed information on the following topics:
Chronic Hepatitis B Testing and Management Algorithm
Interpretation of hepatitis B test results
Tests to run on a hepatitis B surface antigen positive (HBsAg +) individual and how to counsel them
Monitoring and management of the HBsAg + individual
Managing pregnant women who are HBsAg +
Monitoring for liver cancer
The guide is part of Hepatitis B Online – a free suite of materials for providers that supplies information on all topics related to hepatitis B such as when a person should begin treatment and liver cancer screenings. The website also includes prescribing information for approved hepatitis B treatments, and clinical calculators to aid in interpreting predictors of liver damage such as the AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) and fibrosis score.
In January of 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed a new rule that could increase the out-of-pocket costs for people who take prescription medication for hepatitis B in the U.S. The proposed rule states that health insurance companies would be able to collect patient coinsurance through pharmaceutical manufacturer financial assistance. However, the insurance companies will be allowed to disregard any coinsurance paid with copay assistance when calculating how much the patient has paid toward their deductible and annual out-of-pocket (OOP) limit.
This proposal – titled 2021 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters – reverses a recent ruling that would have required health insurance companies to count the value of manufacturer copay assistance toward an enrollee’s annual deductible and OOP limit in most circumstances1. This rule acknowledged that manufacturer copay assistance helps lessen the financial burden of medications for patients. In the US, prescription drugs can be extremely costly, making manufacturer’s copay assistance programs necessary for many patients. For example, brand name treatments are often expensive in order to help pharmaceutical companies earn back the costs of the research and time spent making the medication. Sometimes, the brand name treatments are the only ones that are available, like Vemlidy, or the only version that a person can take. A reversal of the rule would mean that hepatitis B patients and those living with other chronic illnesses may have to pay a larger amount of out-of-pocket costs for their medications.
To understand the significance of this change, we first need to understand what a copay accumulator is.
What is a Copay Accumulator Program and How Does It Work?
A copay accumulator – or accumulator adjustment program – is a strategy used by insurance companies and Pharmacy BenefitsManagers (PBMs) that stop manufacturer copay assistance coupons from counting towards two things: 1) the deductible and 2) the maximum out-of-pocket spending. What does this mean?
Previously, a person could receive financial assistance from companies that make a drug, and that would count towards their deductible and/or out-of-pocket costs, depending upon the insurance plan. Pharmaceutical companies often provide financial assistance (such as a co-pay card) to help underinsured individuals afford expensive medications. This means that the person paying for the drug would end up saving money, often thousands of dollars.
Why Is This an Issue?
As the AIDS Institute explains it, “ … the trend in health insurance benefit design is to shift more of the cost of health care to patients through high deductibles and coinsurance rates …In order to afford the medicine they need, patients increasingly rely on manufacturer copay assistance.” With copay accumulators, the individuals who need assistance the most will be unable to receive it, and will end up paying more for their treatments.
As shown in the above image, with a copay accumulator program – meaning her manufacturer’s assistance is no longer counted toward her out-of-pocket limit- the consumer ends up paying more, while the insurance company is able to reduce the amount they are paying.
Copay accumulator programs are making life-saving treatments increasingly inaccessible. Research shows that the more out-of-pocket costs a person has to pay, the more likely they are to abandon their medication. Once on a hepatitis B medication, stopping suddenly or only taking it once in a while can cause flares and lead to an even higher risk of liver damage.
In the United States, many of those who are living with hepatitis B come from underserved populations with limited access to healthcare. Oftentimes, cultural differences and language barriers can make it difficult to access and utilize the services they need. Now, copay accumulators are making the navigation process even more complex and placing a higher cost burden on patients.
1The rule required insurance companies to count manufacturer copay assistance toward a patient’s deductible and OOP limit for all brand name drugs for which there is no generic alternative and in cases where the patient gained access to the brand name drug through an insurance plan’s appeals or exceptions process.
